[j-nsp] Next Gen MVPN flooding assistance

Mark Tinka mtinka at globaltransit.net
Mon Sep 19 21:45:22 EDT 2011


On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:46:41 PM Krasimir Avramski 
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> It is normal behavior with inclusive P-tunnels (in your
> case P2MP lsps).It is default without explicit selective
> configuration.

Indeed.

We initially started out with I-PMSI's and then wanted to 
shift to S-PMSI's, but then since we needed to deploy MPEG 
probes at every Receiver PE router to record video signal 
quality (and because any router configured with the NG-MVPN 
routing instance has at least one IPTv customer), keeping I-
PMSI's makes sense.

If you don't expect a Receiver PE router to ever have 
Multicast receivers, you likely won't be setting P-tunnels 
towards it in the first place :-).

Now the annoying bit is when you use 'vrf-table-label' and a 
P router generates two copies of every Multicast packet 
toward a bud node. Quite annoying.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20110920/bab9f535/attachment.pgp>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list