[j-nsp] Next Gen MVPN flooding assistance
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Mon Sep 19 21:45:22 EDT 2011
On Friday, September 16, 2011 09:46:41 PM Krasimir Avramski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is normal behavior with inclusive P-tunnels (in your
> case P2MP lsps).It is default without explicit selective
> configuration.
Indeed.
We initially started out with I-PMSI's and then wanted to
shift to S-PMSI's, but then since we needed to deploy MPEG
probes at every Receiver PE router to record video signal
quality (and because any router configured with the NG-MVPN
routing instance has at least one IPTv customer), keeping I-
PMSI's makes sense.
If you don't expect a Receiver PE router to ever have
Multicast receivers, you likely won't be setting P-tunnels
towards it in the first place :-).
Now the annoying bit is when you use 'vrf-table-label' and a
P router generates two copies of every Multicast packet
toward a bud node. Quite annoying.
Cheers,
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20110920/bab9f535/attachment.pgp>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list