[j-nsp] SRX recommended software

[Jeff Rooney]

Thanks everyone, since I'm not looking for any features that are not
available in the 10.4r9.2 then I'll stick there for a bit...I'm fairly
conservative as well :)

Thanks for the input.

Jeff


On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org> wrote:

> We're pretty much on 10.4R8.5 back to 6.5 on most boxes.. no major issues.
> I think we have a couple of boxes on 11.2 code due to features required
> that
> weren't present in 10.4 tree.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brent Jones
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:41 PM
> To: Jeff Rooney
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX recommended software
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Jeff Rooney <jtrooney at nexdlevel.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have a few SRX650's that are running 10.4R9.2 per the Juniper
> > recommended release page
> > http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476
> > However,
> > I just have a few more which came with 11.2R4.3 on them. Just curious
> > as to what everyone is running on these, should I downgrade the new
> > guys? or upgrade old?
> >
> > The workload on these boxes is nothing crazy, some IPSEC vpn, OSPF
> > with about 200 routes, firewalling, no cluster...etc.
> >
> > Thanks for any input.
> >
> > Jeff
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>
> I still run 11.1R3.5 on several sets of SRX1400s.
> Then on branch units, I chose to stick with 10.4R6.5
>
> I have to say, no major issues uncovered so far, same stuff as you, IPSec,
> VPNs, OSPF...
>
> --
> Brent Jones
> brent at brentrjones.com
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>