[j-nsp] mx240 vs asr 9006
Corey Robertson
robertson.corey at gmail.com
Tue Apr 24 21:06:58 EDT 2012
Also, I might be wrong, but doesn't the RSP4G limit the per slot cap to 40g in a single RSP (failure) scenario? That rules out your max 8x10G line rate.
Again I could be wrong, I'm going off of memory.
On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+junipernsp at eintellego.net> wrote:
> Does that put the cost comparison out of alignment?
>
> *Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
> eintellego Pty Ltd
> skeeve at eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net.au>
>
> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
>
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/eintellego
>
> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>
> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
>
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
> Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 09:31, Phil Bedard <philxor at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If you are using the newer RSP440 and newer linecards it is substantially
>> higher, 2M+ IPv4. But you are right the first gen cards the original
>> poster had speced only support 512K in the FIB and we are at 400K+ now in
>> the Internet table.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Doug Hanks <as at juniper.net> wrote:
>>
>>> The last time I looked the ASR9K still had a small FIB and tapped out at
>>> around 500K.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213, JNCIE-SP #875
>>> Sr. Systems Engineer
>>> Juniper Networks
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/24/12 8:55 AM, "Peter" <piotr.1234 at interia.pl> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I have to upgrade my bgp routers, i have budget for two options:
>>>>
>>>> 1.
>>>> - bundle: MX240BASE-AC-HIGH, MPC1-3D-R-B, MIC-3D-20XGE-SFP,
>>>> MIC-3D-2XGE-XFP; configurable RE, SCB, and PEM
>>>> - better routing engine RE-S-1800X2-8G-UPG-BB + jflow license ( netflow
>>>> v9 or ipfix) S-ACCT-JFLOW-IN
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> 2. asr 9006
>>>> - A9K-RSP-4G
>>>> - A9K-MOD80-TR, 80G Modular Linecard, Packet Transport Optimized
>>>> - license for l3 vpn
>>>>
>>>> the price is almost the same. I need:
>>>>
>>>> - ports: from 4x10G line to max 8x10G, line rate
>>>> - 3 virtual routers with full ip routing table v4
>>>> - 10 virtual routers with ca 10k prefix in routing table v4
>>>> - v6
>>>> - up to 12 full bgp feed
>>>> - netflow v9 or ipfix, sampling max 100/s
>>>> - define counters on logical and physical interfaces, count many times
>>>> to the same counter, one packet could be count to different counters in
>>>> next term
>>>> - access to counters via snmp
>>>> - independent control plane and data plane
>>>> - and few others things on bgp edge
>>>>
>>>> which model will be better ?
>>>> thanks for some advice
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list