[j-nsp] mx240 vs asr 9006

[Phil Bedard]

No it is 80G per slot redundant.  The older 8T 8x10G cards are not quite line rate at all packet sizes but are in an IMIX scenario.   Cisco and juniper both have been playing pretty loose with the term line rate lately.  

Pricing wise they do have an 80G modular card which has a 4x10G and 20x1G module which is probably right around the same cost as the MX stuff.  The RSP440 also has a couple 10G ports if you want to use them...

Phil

On Apr 24, 2012, at 9:06 PM, Corey Robertson <robertson.corey at gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, I might be wrong, but doesn't the RSP4G limit the per slot cap to 40g in a single RSP (failure) scenario? That rules out your max 8x10G line rate.
> 
> Again I could be wrong, I'm going off of memory. 
> 
> On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+junipernsp at eintellego.net> wrote:
> 
>> Does that put the cost comparison out of alignment?
>> 
>> *Skeeve Stevens, CEO*
>> eintellego Pty Ltd
>> skeeve at eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net <http://www.eintellego.net.au>
>> 
>> Phone: 1300 753 383 ; Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
>> 
>> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>> 
>> facebook.com/eintellego
>> 
>> twitter.com/networkceoau ; www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>> 
>> PO Box 7726, Baulkham Hills, NSW 1755 Australia
>> 
>> The Experts Who The Experts Call
>> Juniper - Cisco – Brocade - IBM
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 09:31, Phil Bedard <philxor at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> If you are using the newer RSP440 and newer linecards it is substantially
>>> higher, 2M+ IPv4.  But you are right the first gen cards the original
>>> poster had speced only support 512K in the FIB and we are at 400K+ now in
>>> the Internet table.
>>> 
>>> Phil
>>> 
>>> On Apr 24, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Doug Hanks <as at juniper.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The last time I looked the ASR9K still had a small FIB and tapped out at
>>>> around 500K.
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213,  JNCIE-SP #875
>>>> Sr. Systems Engineer
>>>> Juniper Networks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/24/12 8:55 AM, "Peter" <piotr.1234 at interia.pl> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have to upgrade my bgp routers, i have budget for two options:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1.
>>>>> - bundle: MX240BASE-AC-HIGH, MPC1-3D-R-B, MIC-3D-20XGE-SFP,
>>>>> MIC-3D-2XGE-XFP; configurable RE, SCB, and PEM
>>>>> - better routing engine RE-S-1800X2-8G-UPG-BB + jflow license ( netflow
>>>>> v9 or ipfix) S-ACCT-JFLOW-IN
>>>>> 
>>>>> or
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2. asr 9006
>>>>> - A9K-RSP-4G
>>>>> - A9K-MOD80-TR, 80G Modular Linecard, Packet Transport Optimized
>>>>> - license for l3 vpn
>>>>> 
>>>>> the price is almost the same. I need:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - ports: from  4x10G line to  max 8x10G, line rate
>>>>> - 3 virtual routers with full ip routing table v4
>>>>> - 10 virtual routers with ca 10k prefix in routing table v4
>>>>> - v6
>>>>> - up to 12 full bgp feed
>>>>> - netflow v9 or ipfix, sampling max 100/s
>>>>> - define counters on logical and physical interfaces, count many times
>>>>> to the same counter, one packet could be count to different counters in
>>>>> next term
>>>>> - access to counters via snmp
>>>>> - independent control plane and data plane
>>>>> - and few others things on bgp edge
>>>>> 
>>>>> which model will be better ?
>>>>> thanks for some advice
>>>>> 
>>>>> regards
>>>>> Peter
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp