[j-nsp] mx240 vs asr 9006

[Keegan Holley]

Go with the 480 if you go juniper.  The cost difference between chassis is
negligible even if you won't use the extra slots for some time.  Haven't
played with the cisco option much so I can't vouch for the 9k.  Your
environment matters as well.  What your engineers are comfortable with,
what your automation and backend systems suport, etc.  The boxes also
differ in terms of horsepower, number of routes supported,port density.
 Are any of these limits important to you?  If they are really
interchangeable in your environment I'd probably go with the cheaper of the
two.



2012/4/24 Peter <piotr.1234 at interia.pl>

> Hi
>
> I have to upgrade my bgp routers, i have budget for two options:
>
> 1.
> - bundle: MX240BASE-AC-HIGH, MPC1-3D-R-B, MIC-3D-20XGE-SFP,
> MIC-3D-2XGE-XFP; configurable RE, SCB, and PEM
> - better routing engine RE-S-1800X2-8G-UPG-BB + jflow license ( netflow v9
> or ipfix) S-ACCT-JFLOW-IN
>
> or
>
> 2. asr 9006
> - A9K-RSP-4G
> - A9K-MOD80-TR, 80G Modular Linecard, Packet Transport Optimized
> - license for l3 vpn
>
> the price is almost the same. I need:
>
> - ports: from  4x10G line to  max 8x10G, line rate
> - 3 virtual routers with full ip routing table v4
> - 10 virtual routers with ca 10k prefix in routing table v4
> - v6
> - up to 12 full bgp feed
> - netflow v9 or ipfix, sampling max 100/s
> - define counters on logical and physical interfaces, count many times to
> the same counter, one packet could be count to different counters in next
> term
> - access to counters via snmp
> - independent control plane and data plane
> - and few others things on bgp edge
>
> which model will be better ?
> thanks for some advice
>
> regards
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>