[j-nsp] mx240 vs asr 9006

[Phil Bedard]

Yes thanks for mentioning that.  

My opinion would be to use a MX480 like someone else said just due to the increased slot capacity, over the 9006 or 240. 

Phil

On Apr 25, 2012, at 9:33 AM, brad dreisbach <bradd at ntt.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:31:13PM -0400, Phil Bedard wrote:
>> If you are using the newer RSP440 and newer linecards it is substantially higher, 2M+ IPv4.  But you are right the first gen cards the original poster had speced only support 512K in the FIB and we are at 400K+ now in the Internet table.
> 
> You can configure the scale profile on the trident based cards to support 1M
> routes on RSP2.  you do sacrifice some L2 scale though, iirc.
> 
> default —efficient for deployments that require large Layer 2 MAC tables (up to 512,000 entries) and a relatively small number of Layer 3 routes (less than 512,000).
> 
> l3 —efficient for deployments that require more Layer 3 routes (up to 1 million) and smaller Layer 2 MAC tables (less than 128,000 entries).
> 
> l3xl —efficient for deployments that require a very large number of Layer 3 routes (up to 1.3 million) and minimal Layer 2 functionality. Note that the support for up to 1.3 million routes is split into IPv4 scaled support and IPv4/IPV6 scaled support. You can configure up to 1.3 million IPv4 routes, or up to 1 million IPv4 routes with 128,000 IPv6 routes. 
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.2/system_management/configuration/guide/b_sysman_cg42asr9k_chapter_01.html#task_3A082F6CD31D4A238070C3CD7279E67A
> 
> -b
> 
>> 
>> Phil
>> 
>> On Apr 24, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Doug Hanks <as at juniper.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> The last time I looked the ASR9K still had a small FIB and tapped out at
>>> around 500K.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213,  JNCIE-SP #875
>>> Sr. Systems Engineer
>>> Juniper Networks
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/24/12 8:55 AM, "Peter" <piotr.1234 at interia.pl> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi
>>>> 
>>>> I have to upgrade my bgp routers, i have budget for two options:
>>>> 
>>>> 1.
>>>> - bundle: MX240BASE-AC-HIGH, MPC1-3D-R-B, MIC-3D-20XGE-SFP,
>>>> MIC-3D-2XGE-XFP; configurable RE, SCB, and PEM
>>>> - better routing engine RE-S-1800X2-8G-UPG-BB + jflow license ( netflow
>>>> v9 or ipfix) S-ACCT-JFLOW-IN
>>>> 
>>>> or
>>>> 
>>>> 2. asr 9006
>>>> - A9K-RSP-4G
>>>> - A9K-MOD80-TR, 80G Modular Linecard, Packet Transport Optimized
>>>> - license for l3 vpn
>>>> 
>>>> the price is almost the same. I need:
>>>> 
>>>> - ports: from  4x10G line to  max 8x10G, line rate
>>>> - 3 virtual routers with full ip routing table v4
>>>> - 10 virtual routers with ca 10k prefix in routing table v4
>>>> - v6
>>>> - up to 12 full bgp feed
>>>> - netflow v9 or ipfix, sampling max 100/s
>>>> - define counters on logical and physical interfaces, count many times
>>>> to the same counter, one packet could be count to different counters in
>>>> next term
>>>> - access to counters via snmp
>>>> - independent control plane and data plane
>>>> - and few others things on bgp edge
>>>> 
>>>> which model will be better ?
>>>> thanks for some advice
>>>> 
>>>> regards
>>>> Peter
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp