[j-nsp] ASR9001 vs MX80

[Tomasz Mikołajek]

Hello.
Yes and no. Yes, but befor using Trio Chipset, No because now for example
MX480 system capacity is 1.92 Tbps. If I am wrong, please correct me.

2012/8/8 Xu Hu <jstuxuhu0816 at gmail.com>

> Is any reason juniper choose the 5 for mx5, 40 for mx40, 480 for mx480?
> The number is for backplane bandwidth?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Xu Hu
>
> On 8 Aug, 2012, at 5:30, Doug Hanks <dhanks at juniper.net> wrote:
>
> > Please note there's also the MX5 through MX40 that can be upgraded via a
> > license to a full MX80 as well.
> >
> >
> > On 8/7/12 1:56 AM, "Tima Maryin" <timamaryin at mail.ru> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> have a look at:
> >> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-May/023303.html
> >>
> >>
> >> and the whole thread:
> >> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2012-April/023068.html
> >>
> >>
> >> They are about mx480 vs ASR9006, but most of stuff still applies.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07.08.2012 10:22, William Jackson wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> Having used the MX80 in a previous position and now being prompted to
> >>> look at the ASR 9001, I was wondering if any people have operational
> >>> experience with the ASR9001 platform?
> >>> Or any thoughts on comparison.
> >>>
> >>> These will be used for IPv4/IPv6 eBGP transit and for MPLS L2VPN/VPLS
> >>> drop offs, thus all the VLAN tagging, rewriting shenanigans!!
> >>>
> >>> thanks
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>