[j-nsp] LACP Load Balance

[apurva modh]

Hi,

You will not require symmetrical hashing. Just configure,

set forwarding-options hash-key family inet layer-3
set forwarding-options hash-key family inet layer-4

Regards,

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Mohammad Khalil <eng.mssk at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi , Thanks all for the replies
> Regarding the version
> Router# run show version
> Hostname: Router
> Model: mx240
> JUNOS Base OS boot [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Crypto Software Suite [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Packet Forwarding Engine Support (M/T Common) [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Packet Forwarding Engine Support (MX Common) [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Online Documentation [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Voice Services Container package [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Border Gateway Function package [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Services AACL Container package [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Services LL-PDF Container package [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Services Stateful Firewall [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS AppId Services [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS IDP Services [10.0R3.10]
> JUNOS Routing Software Suite [10.0R3.10]
>
> Should i configure something like the below?
> set forwarding-options hash-key family inet symmetric-hash
>
> How does the router know which ae group will apply to ?
> In my case its ae0 and ae1
>
> Thanks in advance for the great help
>
> BR,
> Mohammad
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Stefan Fouant <
> sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net> wrote:
>
> > Also, you need to send a sizable number of flows to effect a proper
> > distribution. A handful of flows is just not going to cut it, based on
> the
> > below mentioned hash.
> >
> > Stefan Fouant
> > JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ENT, JNCI
> > Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks
> >
> > Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Aug 28, 2012, at 3:32 AM, Julien Goodwin <jgoodwin at studio442.com.au>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 28/08/12 17:20, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
> > >> I am trying to make load balancing on the links as I checked the
> traffic
> > >> and its not balanced
> > >> Any ideas will be highly appreciated
> > >
> > > Depending on what traffic you're sending it may not be evenly hashable
> > > across the links.
> > >
> > > Depending on which side is uneven you might find help in:
> > >
> > > EX:
> > >
> >
> http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB22943&smlogin=true
> > >
> > > MX:
> > >
> >
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.3/topics/concept/layer-2-services-load-balancing-and-link-aggregation.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > Julien Goodwin
> > > Studio442
> > > "Blue Sky Solutioneering"
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>