[j-nsp] SRX, UDP traffic, routing asymmetry

[叶雨飞]

J-series is still using P4 class cpu ,ddr2 memory,  where as it is
really cheap to upgrade them for now (I bought ~50$ from ebay , 3G
cpu, 2.5G ram and it handles several copies of full bgp feed just
fine) , it is clear that is not going to last long, they are heading
for EOL really soon in my opinion.

Forcing j-series to be a security router is a joke, i totally agree though.

Speaking of 9.3, i have been running them for almost 2 years now, and
it is working great, all the features are there(only ipesc v1 though
and it is buggy) and given 10.4 is so horribly slow, I simply have 0
intend to upgrade them.

Cheers.

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Michel de Nostredame <d.nostra at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, 叶雨飞 <sunyucong at gmail.com> wrote:
>> downgrade to 9.3R4.4 then
>
> Unfortunately 9.3 is already EOLed (
> http://www.juniper.net/support/eol/junos.html )
>
> Tuning J/SRX into packet-mode will lost several valuable functions
> such as IPsec, Jflow... those are very important for small business.
>
> Selective-packet-mode is also a huge pain from operation point of
> view, also the Jflow will have problem under this.
>
> I believe the best solution is to keep pushing Juniper to bring
> packet-mode OS back to J-series with full functionality.
>
> At this moment, Juniper does not have product, my personal opinion, to
> head-to-head compete against Cisco ISR. J-series could be the most
> closed product line to fill this gap.
>
> --
> Michel~
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp