[j-nsp] Issue with MPLS VPN when using mixed LDP and RSVP Backbone !

[Diogo Montagner]

Hi,

Based on this, I would check the bgp configuration between pe2 and
pe4, and the RR configuration as well on PE2. Check if the inet-vpn
family is negotiated between both neighbors. If the BGP config looks
fine, then it points to rtarget.

The LSP (LDP or RSVP) between PE and RR is required to activate the
routes on RR. You can use a static def route or rib group to achieve
the same.

Pls share the configs and outputs.

Other thing, check if your lo0 filter is allowing the required
protocols. But if you have problems here, then you should identify
them in show bgp summ, show ldp session, sh rsvp session, etc

Regards

On 7/12/12, vaibhava varma <svaibhava at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Diogo
>
>
>> - verify the status of the routes in PE4. Are they being received by
>> the BGP neighbor ? Check the protocol NH status.
>
> Routes are not received by BGP neighbour and I verified this "show
> route receive-protcol bgp x.x.x.x(PE2/RR)
>>
>> - you need to have an LSP between the PE1 and your RR. Same for PE4
>> and RR. But I am assuming this is fine because you see the routes
>> being advertised to PE4 from PE2.
>
> Yes PE2/RR is advertising routes to PE4 and I have verified this with
> ""show route advertising-protcol bgp x.x.x.x(PE4)
>
>>
>> - on PE4, you need to have a LDP route for PE1. I think this may be
>> your issue and this is why I suggested to check with the ping mpls ldp
>> command.
> I have the LDP route for PE1 on PE4 and have verified it under the
> inet.3 table. I am yet to check the ping mpls ldp part and will come
> back on that.
>
> I am still unclear that do we really need an LSP to the RR as RR will
> not overide the NH to itself while reflection ?
>
> Regards
> Varma
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Diogo Montagner
> <diogo.montagner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suggest some steps below:
>>
>> - verify the status of the routes in PE4. Are they being received by
>> the BGP neighbor ? Check the protocol NH status.
>>
>> - you need to have an LSP between the PE1 and your RR. Same for PE4
>> and RR. But I am assuming this is fine because you see the routes
>> being advertised to PE4 from PE2.
>>
>> - on PE4, you need to have a LDP route for PE1. I think this may be
>> your issue and this is why I suggested to check with the ping mpls ldp
>> command.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <svaibhava at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Diogo
>>>
>>> They are not hidden and have already verified the route-target.Its
>>> correctly configured. Any other pointer ?
>>>
>>> Also while using RR do we reallly need the Loopback IP of RR used for
>>> BGP peering to be present in the inet.3 table of PE coz the RR just
>>> reflects the route and does not modifies the NH. All we should need is
>>> the reachability of the remote PE Loopback IP used for BGP Peering to
>>> be in the inet.3 at the Local PE. Is that correct ?
>>>
>>> Thanks much for your help on this issue.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Varma
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Diogo Montagner
>>> <diogo.montagner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> You need check the status of the routes in PE4. If they are hidden it
>>>> may be a LDP issue. If there is no hidden route then your problem may
>>>> be wrong route-target selection.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <svaibhava at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Diogo
>>>>>
>>>>> I have not checked that yet but what I did check was that PE2/RR is
>>>>> advertising the route via BGP to PE4 and PE4 is not accepting it.
>>>>> Right now I do not have access to the setup.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please suggest where can be the issue and what more to check apart
>>>>> from the one you mentioned and I will check and revert in sometime.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Varma
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Diogo Montagner
>>>>> <diogo.montagner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> What happens if you do a ping mpls ldp from PE4-lo0 to PE1-lo0 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/11/12, vaibhava varma <svaibhava at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Dear All
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was testing a setup whereby I am using mix of LDP and RSVP in the
>>>>>>> backbone for transporting MPLS VPN Traffic. The setup is something
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> below:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CE1--PE1------PE2/RR-------PE3----PE4------CE2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now we have a limitation that we can only run LDP between PE4 and
>>>>>>> PE3.
>>>>>>> From PE3 to PE2/RR we have RSVP. From PE3 to PE1 we have LDP
>>>>>>> Tunneling
>>>>>>> over RSVP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now the routes of CE1 are not getting installed into the VRF Table
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> PE4. When checked the inet.3 table I do not see the route for PE2/RR
>>>>>>> Loopback but only PE1 and PE3.
>>>>>>> I tried to add a default static into inet.3 or importing the inet.0
>>>>>>> rib to inet.3 on PE4 but still am not seeing routes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the issue is that the BGP Next Hop is not in inet.3 for
>>>>>>> PE2/RR. How can I achieve to make this setup working apart from
>>>>>>> running LDP Tunneling over RSVP between PE4& PE2/RR or between PE3 &
>>>>>>> PE2/RR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Vaibhava Varma
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ./diogo -montagner
>>>>>> JNCIE-M 0x41A
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Vaibhava Varma
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>>
>>>> ./diogo -montagner
>>>> JNCIE-M 0x41A
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards
>>> Vaibhava Varma
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my mobile device
>>
>> ./diogo -montagner
>> JNCIE-M 0x41A
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Vaibhava Varma
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

./diogo -montagner
JNCIE-M 0x41A