[j-nsp] MX80 poor monitoring, packet loss to RE, SNMP not responding

[Xu Hu]

Does the Juniper RE not the same as Cisco RSP. I think the control plane information all need to go to the RE, if RE had any issue, why the traffic don't have any issue?

Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu

On 18 Jul, 2012, at 22:32, "OBrien, Will" <ObrienH at missouri.edu> wrote:

> Check your fxp0 configuration. You may be shipping return traffic out random interfaces...
> We are leaning toward putting all production traffic inside a virtual routing instance/chassis and using the main routing instance just for management.
> ________________________________________
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] on behalf of Morgan McLean [wrx230 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 1:34 AM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 poor monitoring, packet loss to RE, SNMP not responding
> 
> I have a pair of MX80's that both are very unreliable in terms of trying to
> monitor them. Any traffic destined to the RE, be it ICMP or SNMP seems to
> be very hit or miss. Sometimes SNMP won't respond, pinging it gives me
> maybe 50% loss on average, but it passes traffic fine.
> 
> This causes issues with monitoring, false alerts, etc. I realize the
> traffic destined for the RE is not as important, but the box is hardly
> loaded and among maybe 50 other juniper devices I have, EX, SRX, only these
> are giving me issues.
> 
> Can anybody give me any insight?
> 
> Thanks,
> Morgan
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp