[j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

[Mehmet Akcin]

I am heavily using them, and they are reliable for me

mehmet

On Mar 5, 2012, at 3:28 PM, TCIS List Acct wrote:

> Over the past few years the general feeling I've gotten reading j-nsp and 
> elsewhere was to stay away from the SRX line until the code matured.  We've got 
> an upcoming project that I'm considering using a SRX 240 for.
> 
> Has the code matured to the point that it can be considered a stable platform 
> for security (just basic firewall, 1:1 NATs, maybe a few VPNs), high 
> availability, and some very basic layer 3 routing services?
> 
> TIA.
> 
> --Mike
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp