[j-nsp] OID for BGP inet/0 and inet6.0

[Phil Mayers]

Darren O'Connor <Darren.O'Connor at hso.uk.com> wrote:

>Hi Phil.
>
>Yes, as yet all I can find is a per-neighbour prefix count. Not a total
>count. I guess I could get something to tally them all up and give the
>total, but with peers being added all the time it's a bit of a
>headache.
>Shame I can't just get the total value out.
>
>Does anyone else use cacti to monitor amounts of prefixes in the table?
>If so, what are you polling? Maybe a route-server on your network?
>
>Thanks
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
>Sent: 21 March 2012 08:35
>To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [j-nsp] OID for BGP inet/0 and inet6.0
>
>On 03/20/2012 10:04 PM, Darren O'Connor wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>>
>>
>> Does anyone know the oid value to get the current inet.0 and inet6.0 
>> BGP total values via SNMP?
>
>Are you sure there is one?
>
>There are per-peer per-AF prefix counters under the
>jnxBgpM2PrefixCountersTable hierarchy, but the BGP4-V2-MIB-JUNIPER mib
>doesn't seem to references totals. Of course, I might have an older
>copy
>of the MIB, or it might be in a different MIB.
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>_____________________________________________________________________
>
>This e-mail and all attachments have been scanned by the hSo virus
>scanning service and no known viruses were detected.

There is always junoscript / xml and show route summary
-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos.