[j-nsp] ASR9001 vs MX80

[Skeeve Stevens]

What features would you be using the ASR9k for over the MX80's?

...Skeeve
*

*
*Skeeve Stevens, CEO - *eintellego Pty Ltd
skeeve at eintellego.net ; www.eintellego.net

Phone: 1300 753 383; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellego ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/networkceoau ; blog: www.network-ceo.net

The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco – IBM - Cloud



On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

> On Tuesday, August 07, 2012 08:22:37 AM William Jackson
> wrote:
>
> > Having used the MX80 in a previous position and now being
> > prompted to look at the ASR 9001, I was wondering if any
> > people have operational experience with the ASR9001
> > platform? Or any thoughts on comparison.
>
> I see no one replied to this; probably because the box is
> still new and most operators may not have put them into
> production yet.
>
> I'm looking at deploying some before December (likely,
> alongside some MX80's, as it were). In case I do, and you
> haven't yet done yours, I'll be happy to share feedback.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>