[j-nsp] SRX1400 opinions

[Jerry Jones]

Good, you cannot run UTM on the data center SRX at the moment, branch only.

On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:55 PM, James Howlett <jim.howlett at outlook.com> wrote:

Hello,

Thank you for the heads-up

> Srx's have replication issues with large routing environments. Duplicating two full feeds to the redundant peer will take a looooong time. In some testing many hours.
> 
> With that said the 1400 can do it. Just keep that one major caveat in mind when you want clustered fail over. 
> 


I have a budget only for one 1400 at the moment. 
I don't plan to run UTM on it as well.

Just few bgp sessions, firewall and some DDoS screening.

Regards,
jim

> Hope this helps,
> -Tim Eberhard 
> 
> 
> On Apr 27, 2013, at 10:14 AM, James Howlett <jim.howlett at outlook.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I have a network build on J4350 and SRX240 and i need to upgrade. I was thinking about switching two devices for SRX1400. 
>> My network has 2 full bgp feeds and some peerings. We use about 150-200Mbps average. Will SRX1400 be a good choice then?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> jim
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp