[j-nsp] SRX1400 opinions

[James Howlett]

Ok, that is fine. 

So basically SRX1400 will do fine as BGP router + firewall?

Regards,
jim

> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX1400 opinions
> From: jjones at danrj.com
> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:11:19 -0500
> CC: xmin0s at gmail.com; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> To: jim.howlett at outlook.com
> 
> Good, you cannot run UTM on the data center SRX at the moment, branch only.
> 
> On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:55 PM, James Howlett <jim.howlett at outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Thank you for the heads-up
> 
> > Srx's have replication issues with large routing environments. Duplicating two full feeds to the redundant peer will take a looooong time. In some testing many hours.
> > 
> > With that said the 1400 can do it. Just keep that one major caveat in mind when you want clustered fail over. 
> > 
> 
> 
> I have a budget only for one 1400 at the moment. 
> I don't plan to run UTM on it as well.
> 
> Just few bgp sessions, firewall and some DDoS screening.
> 
> Regards,
> jim
> 
> > Hope this helps,
> > -Tim Eberhard 
> > 
> > 
> > On Apr 27, 2013, at 10:14 AM, James Howlett <jim.howlett at outlook.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> I have a network build on J4350 and SRX240 and i need to upgrade. I was thinking about switching two devices for SRX1400. 
> >> My network has 2 full bgp feeds and some peerings. We use about 150-200Mbps average. Will SRX1400 be a good choice then?
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> jim
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 		 	   		  
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>