[j-nsp] SRX1400 opinions

Craig Askings caskings at ionetworks.com.au
Mon Apr 29 01:33:16 EDT 2013


Hi Jim,

On 29 April 2013 05:49, James Howlett <jim.howlett at outlook.com> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank You very much for the clarification. I will have only one ASBR. As
> for redundancy I'll go with a single 1400 unit and add a second in the
> future. Still, a single SRX1400 will be probably more stable then a single
> J6350.
>

I recently had a client that had a simliar plan to you of a single SRX1400
now to a HA pair later. No BGP though, when we setup the first SRX we
configured it as if it was part of a HA pair and left it running in a
Active/Lost state.

Once we got the second SRX we followed the SRX HA Hardware replacement
procedure in the Juniper KB and it all went smoothly with no hiccups or
outages.

http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21134


-- 

Regards,

Craig Askings

io Networks Pty Ltd.



mobile: 0404 019365

phone: 1300 1 2 4 8 16


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list