[j-nsp] SRX1400 opinions

[Andrew Jones]

You will also need to follow this if adding a New/RMA SRX into a cluster
which is 10.4 or older, should save you a few days of troubleshooting :)

http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB23929


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Craig Askings
<caskings at ionetworks.com.au>wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> On 29 April 2013 05:49, James Howlett <jim.howlett at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Thank You very much for the clarification. I will have only one ASBR. As
> > for redundancy I'll go with a single 1400 unit and add a second in the
> > future. Still, a single SRX1400 will be probably more stable then a
> single
> > J6350.
> >
>
> I recently had a client that had a simliar plan to you of a single SRX1400
> now to a HA pair later. No BGP though, when we setup the first SRX we
> configured it as if it was part of a HA pair and left it running in a
> Active/Lost state.
>
> Once we got the second SRX we followed the SRX HA Hardware replacement
> procedure in the Juniper KB and it all went smoothly with no hiccups or
> outages.
>
> http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21134
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Askings
>
> io Networks Pty Ltd.
>
>
>
> mobile: 0404 019365
>
> phone: 1300 1 2 4 8 16
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>