[j-nsp] JunOS version for MX40?

[Gustavo Santos]

I second that, 12.1R. No problem for almost a year using it on an border
router with two full bgp feeds, two IXP feeds and lots of iBGP / OSPF.


Gustavo Santos
Analista de Redes
CCNA , MTCNA , MTCRE, MTCINE, JUNCIA-ER


2013/2/7 james jones <james at freedomnet.co.nz>

> if you can, I would go with at least the latest 12.1R. lots of bug fixes.
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Gabriel Blanchard <gabe at teksavvy.ca>
> wrote:
>
> > If it's for a lab...why not run greatest and latest? if not, run the
> > recommended.
> >
> > On 13-02-07 03:08 PM, Steve Feldman wrote:
> > > I have a couple of shiny new MX40s in my lab, and need to do some
> > testing before we deploy them.
> > >
> > > They will be doing fairly vanilla BGP (~2 full feeds), IS-IS and/or
> > OSPF, and some interface filtering.  No MPLS for now, but possibly in the
> > future to support L2VPN/L3VPN services.
> > >
> > > What is your favorite version of JunOS for the MX5/10/40?  Juniper is
> > recommending 11.2R5.5 this week.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >     Steve
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>