[j-nsp] ASR9001 vs MX80

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun Feb 17 11:02:31 EST 2013


On Monday, October 01, 2012 06:30:19 PM Skeeve Stevens 
wrote:

> What features would you be using the ASR9k for over the
> MX80's?

It's a price thing :-).

Technically, the ASR9001 "can" deliver 40Gbps ports on the 
chassis. That's one reason to choose it over the MX80 (that 
and the possibility that IOS XR is shaping up to be better 
code than Junos, hehe).

That said, the MX80 won on price, and for what we needed the 
deployment for, 40Gbps ports weren't an urgent or life-
changing requirement.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20130217/d5336692/attachment.sig>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list