[j-nsp] Advice on a 100Gbps+ environment
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Jul 2 10:19:21 EDT 2013
On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 03:19:27 PM sthaug at nethelp.no
wrote:
> In fact I'd say that MXes are an excellent choice for
> peering/transit edge.
Yes, if you have tons of high speed peering, the MX chassis'
are good if terminating the links on the box directly is
commercially feasible.
Otherwise, we relegate peering to ASR9001's, MX80's (very
poor CPU, though) and ASR1002-X's (depending on whether
10Gbps will be needed or not).
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20130702/73989798/attachment.sig>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list