[j-nsp] L2VPN Termination

[Krasimir Avramski]

Hi,

On the core instance: set routing-instances xyz_IP_Transit protocols vpls
connectivity-type irb

Krasi


On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org> wrote:

> Thanks folksŠ
>
> I have an issue with implementing this and was hoping for a "sanity
> check". ;)
>
> On the "core" side of this implementation I am not taking the VPLS
> instance to any form of a physical interface - I only have an IRB
> interface and the VPLS path will not come up.  I'm assuming the VPLS path
> won't establish because of lack of a physical interface or is it just
> something else that I've misconfigured?
>
> Core Router (MX480):
>
> paul at xxxxxxxxxxx> show configuration routing-instances
> xyz_IP_Transit {
>     instance-type vpls;
>     vlan-id 100;
>     routing-interface irb.100;
>     route-distinguisher xx.xx.xx.xx:100;
>     vrf-target target:11666:9100;
>     protocols {
>         vpls {
>             site-range 20;
>             no-tunnel-services;
>             site Core {
>                 site-identifier 2;
>             }
>         }
>     }
> }
>
> CPE Facing Router (MX80):
>
>
> paul at dis1.peterborough4> show configuration routing-instances
> xyz_IP_Transit {
>     instance-type vpls;
>     vlan-id 100;
>     interface ge-1/1/0.100;
>     route-distinguisher xx.xx.xx.xx:100;
>     vrf-target target:11666:9100;
>     protocols {
>         vpls {
>             site-range 20;
>             no-tunnel-services;
>             site customer {
>                 site-identifier 1;
>             }
>         }
>     }
> }
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 2013-07-26 2:08 PM, "Tarko Tikan" <tarko at lanparty.ee> wrote:
>
> >hey,
> >
> >> Alternatively use routed VPLS on the core box if it is also an MX and a
> >> standard VPLS instance on the edge:
> >>
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.2/topics/task/configuratio
> >> n/vpls-irb-solutions.html
> >
> >+1 for this. Not a hack, we have been using this for a while now and got
> >all major bugs fixed over time. In production for hundreds of thousands
> >of customers.
> >
> >Don't use lt- interfaces if you don't have to.
> >
> >> Or if you are game then in the next release you should get "psX"
> >> interfaces on the MX for direct PWHT although it will still be bound to
> >> an lt- interface underneath.  Documentation already exists for this for
> >> 13.1.
> >
> >+1 for this as well. This will supposedly support all the features
> >physical ports do so you can do HQoS etc.
> >
> >--
> >tarko
> >_______________________________________________
> >juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>