[j-nsp] Juniper MX480 BNG Feature ?

Thong Hawk Yen hawk.yen.thong at time.com.my
Thu Jun 6 11:06:19 EDT 2013


Thanks Paul.



There is no way we can do it at this moment. We have not received any positive feedback from our counterparts.

There has been a lot of crazy idea from non-IP engineering department to conserve IPv4 addresses, this is one of those.



Regards

Amos Thong

------------------------------------------------------------------------





Hi Thong - I don't believe there is a way to do this in JunOS Š. Would

love to hear otherwise though.



Paul







On 2013-06-04 6:51 AM, "Thong Hawk Yen" <hawk.yen.thong at time.com.my<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp>> wrote:



>Hi J-NSP Members,

>

>We are using MX480 with Junos [11.4X27.44] as BRAS and with Juniper

>policy manager SRC with Software version SRC-PE Release 4.2 [V4.2.0.R-16]

>to provide Broadband services over PPPoE.

>The BRAS is the element  that is leasing out IP addresses to the

>subscribers on the ppo interfaces. We notice that there is a high

>percentage of users are actually idling, not sending/receiving any

>traffic but the sessions are taking up ip addresses.

>

>It is not very efficient to time-out their session because customer end

>routers will re-dial. Is there a way to leave the PPPoE session on while

>the BRAS relinquish idling sessions ip address and re-assign when the

>customer traffic is back ?

>

>Please advise. Any feedback from any deployment of other BRAS would be

>helpful. Thanks.

>

>Regards

>thong


________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY
-------------------------
The contents of and any attachments to this email are private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or addressee indicated in this message, please notify the sender of the error and destroy the email and any attachments. Please do not reproduce the contents of the email or its attachments as such reproduction is a breach of confidentiality and for which legal action including injunctive relief may be sought against you. If it is your company policy that official communications are not by email, please advise immediately. Any opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of TIME dotCom shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by TIME dotCom, nor shall TIME dotCom shall be liable (directly or vicariously) for such opinions, statements or communications.


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list