[j-nsp] NAT on MX platforms?

[OBrien, Will]

My CGNAT works very well.  Currently providing NAT for a few /16s of private space.

On Sep 18, 2013, at 11:13 AM, rkramer wrote:

> I currently use MX240's throughout my routing environment today, and I'm
> looking to upgrade my existing NAT boxes, which are Cisco ASR's.  They are
> running out of horsepower, and from what I'm seeing, MS-DPC's on MX's
> provide more than enough capacity...  I'm not planning to do any
> firewalling at the NAT locations, just nat pools and 1:1 nat translations,
> with some 6to4 thrown in for good measure.
> 
> 
> Anyway, I'm assuming someone on the list has to be running MX's doing NAT?
> How is it working out for you?  Any pitfalls?
> 
> 
> Ryan Kramer
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp