[j-nsp] NAT on MX platforms?

[Per Granath]

The new MS-MIC is coming too...

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.2/topics/concept/ms-mic-and-mpc-overview.html

So, it fits in MPC1/MPC2, if you have a free MIC slot.
It costs a lot less than the MS-DPC, although it has about the same capacity.

Fits in the back of MX80 too...


-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tomasz Mikolajek
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 9:13 PM
To: rkramer
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] NAT on MX platforms?

Hi.
Now we are testing Juniper device do CGNAT. MX240 with MS-DPC card.
Everything work fine. I heard that in new year will be shipped new service card. Can any one say more about "new" MS-DPC?


2013/9/18 rkramer <rkramer at gmail.com>

> I currently use MX240's throughout my routing environment today, and 
> I'm looking to upgrade my existing NAT boxes, which are Cisco ASR's.  
> They are running out of horsepower, and from what I'm seeing, MS-DPC's 
> on MX's provide more than enough capacity...  I'm not planning to do 
> any firewalling at the NAT locations, just nat pools and 1:1 nat 
> translations, with some 6to4 thrown in for good measure.
>
>
> Anyway, I'm assuming someone on the list has to be running MX's doing NAT?
> How is it working out for you?  Any pitfalls?
>
>
> Ryan Kramer
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp