[j-nsp] NAT on MX platforms?

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, September 18, 2013 06:13:06 PM rkramer wrote:

> I currently use MX240's throughout my routing environment
> today, and I'm looking to upgrade my existing NAT boxes,
> which are Cisco ASR's.  They are running out of
> horsepower, and from what I'm seeing, MS-DPC's on MX's
> provide more than enough capacity...  I'm not planning
> to do any firewalling at the NAT locations, just nat
> pools and 1:1 nat translations, with some 6to4 thrown in
> for good measure.

Just for completeness, have you already looked at the larger 
Cisco ESP's for the ASR1000 platform? Not sure if you're 
running hardware where the ESP is modular.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20130924/c219d798/attachment.sig>