[j-nsp] Junos ospf question

[Jonathan Lassoff]

Seems doable to me, so long as there are prefixes for both the storage
gear hanging off of router "A" and "B". If, for example, your storage
gear hanging off of "B" is using a default route to reach the gear off
of "A", then you can't do it.

Add a term to your applicable OSPF import policy on all three routers
that matches the next-hops of the low-speed GigE paths, and the
prefixes applicable for your storage application. Then, reject the
route.

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:39 AM, R S <dim0sal at hotmail.com> wrote:
> basically I've a triangulation A - B - C - A
>
> single area 0
>
> A-B link is 10Gbs
> A-C and B-C is 1 Gbs
>
> since in A-B run a very high volume of traffic (storage), I do not want if A-B fails this traffic goes through C
>
> C redistribute as well statics into OSPF
>
> Hope it clear now
>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Junos ospf question
> From: p1 at westerlund.se
> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:23:39 +0200
> CC: ipv6freely at gmail.com; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> To: dim0sal at hotmail.com
>
> Can you give some more details? I'm not sure I understand all of your requirements.
> Are you trying to influence something native to OSPF, or are you talking about setting metrics for routes redistributed (Cisco-speak) from another protocol?
> /Per
> 25 sep 2013 kl. 10:09 skrev R S <dim0sal at hotmail.com>:I understood the same and I need to be able to drop network announcement in a very granular way...
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp