[j-nsp] SRX550 as MPLS/VPLS platform

[Tom Storey]

Cost, essentially.

I have recommended the MX5-MX80 series instead, being a proper routing
platform,  but was asked to find other options too.
On 16 Apr 2014 20:07, "Chris Jones" <ipv6freely at gmail.com> wrote:

> Why not an MX instead?
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Tom Storey <tom at snnap.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone.
>>
>> The SRX240 works pretty well as an MPLS/VPLS platform when stuck in
>> packet mode.
>>
>> I am wondering if the SRX550 operates in a similar way?
>>
>> Has anyone out there used an SRX550 as a slightly more high powered
>> xPLS platform? Of particular interest it has 10GE modules available
>> that the SRX240 doesnt have.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Jones
> JNCIE-ENT #272
> CCIE# 25655 (R&S)
>