[j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?

[Eugeniu Patrascu]

I am also interested in experiences with the EX4300s in the same kind of
setup.

Thanks.


On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Paul S. <contact at winterei.se> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> We're considering the EX4300 to run routing (l3) for a few hypervisors of
> ours that are connected via l2.
>
> Primarily interested due to the rather massive arp limit (64, 000) on the
> switch, but we've been told (and searched for ourselves to find out) that
> the 4300 platform has been plagued by random issues since launch.
>
> Has this improved, and is anyone using the 4300 on a primarily L3
> environment who could possibly chime in?
>
> It seems to be the most cost effective way to get arp entries on a Juniper
> platform (Other than upgrading to the full stacks like 8200/9200).
>
> Off-list replies are welcome, and thanks to everyone reading this
> beforehand.
>
> -- Paul
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>