[j-nsp] R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: QinQ interface configuration question

[dim0sal]

Didn't catch your point. 

Inside routing-instances configuration you have to declare which interfaces belongs to... right?



Sent with Mobile 

-------- Messaggio originale --------
Da: sthaug at nethelp.no 
Data:  
A: dim0sal at hotmail.com 
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
Oggetto: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [j-nsp] QinQ interface configuration question 
 
> What about scenario 4) in this way:
> 
> interface ge-0/0/0.1
> vlan-tags outer a inner a
> 
> and
> 
> interface ge-0/0/0.2
> vlan-tags outer a inner a
> 
> This is what we re talking about.
> This doesn't work despite of the different routing-instances, right?

Obviously doesn't work. And I'm afraid I don't understand what you
are trying to achieve here. With different routing-instances, *what
exactly* is supposed to determine which routing-instance a packet
belongs to?

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no