[j-nsp] QinQ interface configuration question

Edward Dore edward.dore at freethought-internet.co.uk
Sun Jul 20 14:54:07 EDT 2014


How does the device know which unit on the physical interface an ingress packet belongs to though when you’re defining the same VLAN tags on each unit?

Edward Dore 
Freethought Internet 

On 20 Jul 2014, at 19:47, dim0sal <dim0sal at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Didn't catch your point. 
> 
> Inside routing-instances configuration you have to declare which interfaces belongs to... right?
> 
> 
> 
> Sent with Mobile 
> 
> -------- Messaggio originale --------
> Da: sthaug at nethelp.no 
> Data:  
> A: dim0sal at hotmail.com 
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> Oggetto: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [j-nsp] QinQ interface configuration question 
> 
>> What about scenario 4) in this way:
>> 
>> interface ge-0/0/0.1
>> vlan-tags outer a inner a
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> interface ge-0/0/0.2
>> vlan-tags outer a inner a
>> 
>> This is what we re talking about.
>> This doesn't work despite of the different routing-instances, right?
> 
> Obviously doesn't work. And I'm afraid I don't understand what you
> are trying to achieve here. With different routing-instances, *what
> exactly* is supposed to determine which routing-instance a packet
> belongs to?
> 
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list