[j-nsp] R: Re: QinQ interface configuration question

[dim0sal]

Yes, this is the point why it doesn't work.

Tks



Sent with Mobile 

-------- Messaggio originale --------
Da: Edward Dore <edward.dore at freethought-internet.co.uk> 
Data:  
A: dim0sal <dim0sal at hotmail.com> 
Cc: sthaug at nethelp.no,juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
Oggetto: Re: [j-nsp] QinQ interface configuration question 
 
How does the device know which unit on the physical interface an ingress packet belongs to though when you’re defining the same VLAN tags on each unit?

Edward Dore 
Freethought Internet 

On 20 Jul 2014, at 19:47, dim0sal <dim0sal at hotmail.com> wrote:

Didn't catch your point. 

Inside routing-instances configuration you have to declare which interfaces belongs to... right?



Sent with Mobile 

-------- Messaggio originale --------
Da: sthaug at nethelp.no 
Data:  
A: dim0sal at hotmail.com 
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
Oggetto: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [j-nsp] QinQ interface configuration question 

What about scenario 4) in this way:

interface ge-0/0/0.1
vlan-tags outer a inner a

and

interface ge-0/0/0.2
vlan-tags outer a inner a

This is what we re talking about.
This doesn't work despite of the different routing-instances, right?

Obviously doesn't work. And I'm afraid I don't understand what you
are trying to achieve here. With different routing-instances, *what
exactly* is supposed to determine which routing-instance a packet
belongs to?

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp