[j-nsp] Question about inline flow sampling on MX 480 / Treo based interfaces

[Scott Granados]

So that’s what the book says but the sample rate does seem to have an effect.  I found some previous threads on this list while googling and they indicate that when changing the sample rate the multipliers change on the collector but there’s some question about the 1:1 as the only supported rate.  I’m mainly just wanting to make sure if I set 1:1 I won’t blow up the boxes.:)

I’m getting more confused the more I google so hopefully we can get some definitive answer.


On Jun 11, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Eric Van Tol <eric at atlantech.net> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
>> Of Scott Granados
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:13 AM
>> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [j-nsp] Question about inline flow sampling on MX 480 / Treo
>> based interfaces
>> 
>> What's the story on this and are there any
>> pointers to methods of determining the best most granular rate possible?
>> Any help would be most appreciated.
>> 
> 
> It's my understanding that the sample rate has no effect when inline sampling is being done.  It can be configured, but sampling is performed on a 1:1 ratio no matter what.  Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
> 
> -evt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp