[j-nsp] MX104 with full BGP table problems

Saku Ytti saku at ytti.fi
Fri May 16 15:20:50 EDT 2014


On (2014-05-16 22:09 +0300), Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:

> As a side question: what is Juniper's benefit on running a custom processor
> for control plane management instead of x86 CPUs like they do with other
> routing engines?

bill-of-material, pincount, thermal might be argument, they are SOC so you get
everything nicely in single package.

Freescale PQ3 is very very common CPU, every vendor users them in many boxes.
They are more common than X86 in embedded stuff.

-- 
  ++ytti


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list