[j-nsp] MX104 with full BGP table problems
Saku Ytti
saku at ytti.fi
Fri May 16 15:20:50 EDT 2014
On (2014-05-16 22:09 +0300), Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
> As a side question: what is Juniper's benefit on running a custom processor
> for control plane management instead of x86 CPUs like they do with other
> routing engines?
bill-of-material, pincount, thermal might be argument, they are SOC so you get
everything nicely in single package.
Freescale PQ3 is very very common CPU, every vendor users them in many boxes.
They are more common than X86 in embedded stuff.
--
++ytti
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list