[j-nsp] MX104 with full BGP table problems

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, May 16, 2014 09:20:50 PM Saku Ytti wrote:

> bill-of-material, pincount, thermal might be argument,
> they are SOC so you get everything nicely in single
> package.

I know Juniper are not thinking of anything more powerful in 
the MX104 due to thermal budget, but alluded to the fact 
that this could change as more powerful CPU's require lower 
thermal budgets, due to the fact that the RE's on the MX104 
are modular.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20140517/73bfbdf4/attachment.sig>