[j-nsp] EX3300/4300 Switch MPLS CCC Support
Robin Williams
robin.williams at tnp.net.uk
Sat Nov 8 09:17:30 EST 2014
I've definitely got some sympathy for MPLS (and BGP in fact) being a
licensed option given it's a feature most probably wouldn't want (albeit
a very useful one for a niche who will pay a lot for an AFL to support
it), but things like OSPF and IPv6 should be standard features and are
on most competitors L3 switches. I mean, taxing users wanting IPv6? Is
that Juniper's contribution to helping people push v6 support forward?
Robin
On 08/11/14 04:47, Tim Jackson wrote:
> Licenses for stupid SW features are total BS, here's to hoping that
> Juniper figures this out. Probably not though.
>
> If I missed that, sorry..
>
> From what I know, MPLS on new EX is unlikely to happen (even though I
> really really really want it). ACX is where MPLS on Broadcom based
> products is going to happen (outside of the generous MPLS featureset
> available on QFX today).
>
> --
> Tim
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Skeeve Stevens
> <skeeve+junipernsp at eintellegonetworks.com
> <mailto:skeeve+junipernsp at eintellegonetworks.com>> wrote:
>
> I was referring to OSPF, IPv6, etc.. basic features....
>
> and the fact you need an EFL and AFL now is just rude.
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com
> <mailto:skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com> ;
> www.eintellegonetworks.com <http://www.eintellegonetworks.com/>
>
> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383
> <tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383> ; skype://skeeve
>
> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks
> <http://facebook.com/eintellegonetworks> ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
>
> twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog:
> www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com/>
>
>
> The Experts Who The Experts Call
>
> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud- Consulting- IPv4 Brokering
>
> On 8 November 2014 15:35, Tim Jackson <jackson.tim at gmail.com
> <mailto:jackson.tim at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Is MPLS CCC really a basic feature?
>
> What other enterprise switch can do L2 over MPLS?
>
> I'd imagine that EX4300 is capable of it (and more) that it
> can do it,
> but why waste the effort making l2circuit work on Broadcom DC/EX
> chips? It wasn't promised in the switches datasheets, was it?
>
> Push for cash?
>
> Basic features?
>
> You got shit for free now you expect it. I agree that shit
> should just
> appear from my vendors magically for free at prices cheaper
> than their
> competitors, but I also live in the real world where reality
> and my
> dreams aren't the same thing..
>
> Then again, I'm also just an angry man waiting on his plane in
> an airport...
>
> --
> Tim
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Skeeve Stevens
> <skeeve+junipernsp at eintellegonetworks.com
> <mailto:skeeve%2Bjunipernsp at eintellegonetworks.com>> wrote:
> > I agree... it is quite rude and seems to be just a push for cash
> > considering what basic features these are.
> >
> >
> > ...Skeeve
> >
> > *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> > skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com
> <mailto:skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com> ;
> www.eintellegonetworks.com <http://www.eintellegonetworks.com>
> >
> > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383
> <tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383> ; skype://skeeve
> >
> > facebook.com/eintellegonetworks
> <http://facebook.com/eintellegonetworks> ;
> <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>
> >
> > twitter.com/theispguy <http://twitter.com/theispguy> ; blog:
> www.theispguy.com <http://www.theispguy.com>
> >
> >
> > The Experts Who The Experts Call
> > Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
> >
> > On 8 November 2014 12:26, Robin Williams
> <robin.williams at tnp.net.uk <mailto:robin.williams at tnp.net.uk>>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> We currently make some use of the MPLS CCC functionality of
> EX3200 and
> >> EX4200 switches with the AFL, but note that their
> replacements EX3300 and
> >> EX4300 don't have any MPLS support. Does anyone know if
> this is a
> >> temporary lack of support while the box is being developed
> further, or is
> >> there no plans no bring this support back in the new
> products? I don't
> >> like the way the EX3300 is being touted as the replacement
> for the EX3200
> >> but the feature set has entirely changed.
> >>
> >> I also think it's a bit rich that you now need an EFL
> license for things
> >> like OSPF support, where you didn't previously, and for the
> AFL features
> >> such as BGP, you now need both an EFL *AND* and AFL where
> you previously
> >> only needed an AFL.
> >>
> >> Would be interested to hear other opinions on this, to me
> it all seems
> >> like a bit of a silly move on the part of Juniper and a
> gift to Cisco.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Robin.
> >>
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list