[j-nsp] EX3300/4300 Switch MPLS CCC Support

[Dovid Bender]

:( I thought Juniper was trying to get more business...

------Original Message------
From: Skeeve Stevens
Sender: juniper-nsp
To: Tim Jackson
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX3300/4300 Switch MPLS CCC Support
Sent: Nov 7, 2014 23:44

I was referring to OSPF, IPv6, etc.. basic features....

and the fact you need an EFL and AFL now is just rude.


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering

On 8 November 2014 15:35, Tim Jackson <jackson.tim at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is MPLS CCC really a basic feature?
>
> What other enterprise switch can do L2 over MPLS?
>
> I'd imagine that EX4300 is capable of it (and more) that it can do it,
> but why waste the effort making l2circuit work on Broadcom DC/EX
> chips? It wasn't promised in the switches datasheets, was it?
>
> Push for cash?
>
> Basic features?
>
> You got shit for free now you expect it. I agree that shit should just
> appear from my vendors magically for free at prices cheaper than their
> competitors, but I also live in the real world where reality and my
> dreams aren't the same thing..
>
> Then again, I'm also just an angry man waiting on his plane in an
> airport...
>
> --
> Tim
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Skeeve Stevens
> <skeeve+junipernsp at eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:
> > I agree... it is quite rude and seems to be just a push for cash
> > considering what basic features these are.
> >
> >
> > ...Skeeve
> >
> > *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> > skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
> >
> > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
> >
> > facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve
> >
> > twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
> >
> >
> > The Experts Who The Experts Call
> > Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
> >
> > On 8 November 2014 12:26, Robin Williams <robin.williams at tnp.net.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> We currently make some use of the MPLS CCC functionality of EX3200 and
> >> EX4200 switches with the AFL, but note that their replacements EX3300
> and
> >> EX4300 don't have any MPLS support.  Does anyone know if this is a
> >> temporary lack of support while the box is being developed further, or
> is
> >> there no plans no bring this support back in the new products?  I don't
> >> like the way the EX3300 is being touted as the replacement for the
> EX3200
> >> but the feature set has entirely changed.
> >>
> >> I also think it's a bit rich that you now need an EFL license for things
> >> like OSPF support, where you didn't previously, and for the AFL features
> >> such as BGP, you now need both an EFL *AND* and AFL where you previously
> >> only needed an AFL.
> >>
> >> Would be interested to hear other opinions on this, to me it all seems
> >> like a bit of a silly move on the part of Juniper and a gift to Cisco.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Robin.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Regards,

Dovid