[j-nsp] EX4550 L2Circuit/VPN to MX80/lt Interface
Chip Gwyn
chip.gwyn at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 19:29:56 EST 2014
I was using RSVP at the time, sorry I left that part out. If you're getting one-way traffic it might be that one of the LSPs isn't up.
--chip
Sent from my mobile device, please excuse any typos.
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Eduardo Schoedler <listas at esds.com.br> wrote:
>
> There's no need to run "protocols ldp" ?
>
> --
> Eduardo Schoedler
>
> 2014-11-12 17:18 GMT-02:00 Alexander Arseniev <arseniev at btinternet.com>:
>> There is a line missing on MX side:
>>
>> set interfaces lt-0/0/0.0 family ccc
>>
>> Thanks
>> Alex
>>
>> 12/11/2014 16:51, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 11/11/14 22:29, chip a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> http://pastebin.com/YYfHk9M2
>>>>
>>>> That should get you. *Caveats apply* but it does work =)
>>>>
>>>> --chip
>>>
>>>
>>> Thks you chip.
>>>
>>> With your configuration I've made some progress.
>>> Now I've got some arp replies on the CE connected to the EX :
>>>
>>> 2.1.1.5 > 2.1.1.6: ICMP echo request, id 26654, seq 11, length 64
>>> 17:42:39.031721 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has
>>> 2.1.1.5 tell 2.1.1.6, length 46
>>> 17:42:39.031731 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Reply 2.1.1.5 is-at
>>> 78:2b:cb:28:2d:55, length 28
>>>
>>> The lt mac is correctly learn on the CE.
>>> But for one reason or another the mac address of the ce is not learn on
>>> the mx80 side ?!
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm just out of luck for this setup :(
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
> --
> Eduardo Schoedler
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list