[j-nsp] ACX is just not there (was Re: EX4550 L2Circuit/VPN to MX80/lt Interface)

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, November 13, 2014 05:09:49 PM Phil Bedard 
wrote:

> Maybe vMX is the answer to a 1U MX at this point,
> depending on the throughput you really need.

This is only useful where you need a cheap router for some 
routing and port density is of no concern. So route 
reflectors, simple routing in the data centre, enterprise 
office routers, e.t.c.

The reason we deploy ME3600X's is MPLS in fibre access 
rings. vMX won't be of any use there.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20141113/13f2f704/attachment.sig>