[j-nsp] ACX is just not there (was Re: EX4550 L2Circuit/VPN to MX80/lt Interface)
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Thu Nov 13 11:10:38 EST 2014
On Thursday, November 13, 2014 05:44:16 PM Eric Van Tol
wrote:
> Or am I misunderstanding the vMX? Not trying to be
> snarky, it's a serious question. I am not sure where I
> would see the vMX in a production service provider
> network, but I am certainly open to ideas.
I'd deploy vMX as a route reflector. I was actually
evaluating vRR a few months ago, but it still had a long way
to go, so went with Cisco's CSR1000v (which is, basically,
IOS XE) instead.
We run all our route reflectors on CSR1000v, off 1U HP
servers. Very nice!
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20141113/99c73ea8/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list