[j-nsp] CGNAT on a MX240 acting as BNG

[Octavio Alfageme]

Thank you, all for sharing your experience. I really appreciate your help.
Now I have several things to work on: MS-MPC vs MS-DPC, best service-set
approach for our scenario, ... ;-))

Thank you

Kind regards

Octavio





On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Dung.tran <dung.tran at svtech.com.vn> wrote:

> Hi Octavio!
> CGNAT on MX can run two mode :
>         Option 1) an interface (interface-style service-set)
>         Option 2) a routing next hop (next-hop service-set)
> You can check network topology and choose option 1 or option 2.
> Thanks!
>
>  Best regards,
>
> TRAN QUANG DUNG
>   Network Engineering
>
>   t (84-4) 39 42 71 00 (ext: 128)
>   f     (84-8) 39 42 71 02
>   m    (84) 979423570
>
>
>     Ha noi Rep. Office:
>     R 307, Sky City Tower A, 88 Lang Ha Str.,
>     Dong Da  Dist., Ha noi, Vietnam
>     www.svtech.com.vn
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> Of
> Octavio Alfageme
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 2:26 PM
> To: juniper-nsp
> Subject: [j-nsp] CGNAT on a MX240 acting as BNG
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have several MX240s acting as BNGs for PPPoE subscribers. Due to IPv4
> scarcity I need to start running CGNAT on them (both NAT444 and DS-Lite)
> with dedicated MS-DPC cards. I've searching for information about this
> scenario and I was unable to find it. Do you know if there are restrictions
> to run BNG function and CGNAT for these PPPoE subscribers in the same
> MX240?
> Does any of you have MX series routers acting as CGNAT/BNGs in your
> network?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Octavio
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>