[j-nsp] solution to a firewall question

Vijesh Chandran vijesh at juniper.net
Thu Apr 23 17:38:50 EDT 2015

Hi Olivier,
 My bad that I didn't specify this in original mail... 
Caveat here is that, next term shall be avoided as per requirement. 

From: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of Olivier Benghozi <olivier.benghozi at wifirst.fr>
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:39 AM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question

Replace accept with next term in f1 ?

next term works across filter list from what I see and according to the documentation ( http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/concept/firewall-filter-option-multiple-listed-overview.html <http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/concept/firewall-filter-option-multiple-listed-overview.html> ).


> Le 23 avr. 2015 à 17:18, Vijesh Chandran <vijesh at juniper.net> a écrit :
> Hi all,
>  I am wondering if we have a solution to this issue.
>  I need two firewall attached to an interface as input-list. e.g.: f1 and f2.
>  Input-list [f1 f2]
>  f1 to match a condition (all tcp port 80) and accept and count that packet.
>  f2 to classify those packets based on code points and push to a forwarding class. Is this possible?

juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net

More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list