[j-nsp] SRX and MX Security

Santiago Martinez santiago.martinez.uk at gmail.com
Sun Dec 27 16:22:56 EST 2015


Hi, there is no Inter chassis ha for the MX series with MS-cards . Also the number of supported IPSEC tunnel and tunnels per second is really low/bad. the pps is not as bad as the session but is nothing similar to what huawe or alcatel can do.

regards

santi

Sent from my iPhone

> On 27 Dec 2015, at 09:40, Ibariouen Khalid <ibariouen at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> we currenmly have an NS5400 firewalls (two FW in active /passive mode); we
> are thinking to replace it with MS-MIC/MPC on existing MX-960.
> can you please tell me if we can have redudancy with MX in this case ?
> for your information we have NAT and IP-Sec.
> i'm asking because in NS5400 we have HA port , and i'm wondering if in case
> we use MX how redudancy and session sync will take place ?
> can you please advise the fesability of the solution.
> it"s urgent
> Thanks a lot
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list