[j-nsp] SRX and MX Security

[ashish verma]

http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/usage-guidelines/services-configuring-stateful-firewall-rules.html

For sync between the MS-MICs follow up directly with Juniper (there is a
solution but I have not tested it myself yet)

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Santiago Martinez <
santiago.martinez.uk at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, there is no Inter chassis ha for the MX series with MS-cards . Also
> the number of supported IPSEC tunnel and tunnels per second is really
> low/bad. the pps is not as bad as the session but is nothing similar to
> what huawe or alcatel can do.
>
> regards
>
> santi
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 27 Dec 2015, at 09:40, Ibariouen Khalid <ibariouen at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> > we currenmly have an NS5400 firewalls (two FW in active /passive mode);
> we
> > are thinking to replace it with MS-MIC/MPC on existing MX-960.
> > can you please tell me if we can have redudancy with MX in this case ?
> > for your information we have NAT and IP-Sec.
> > i'm asking because in NS5400 we have HA port , and i'm wondering if in
> case
> > we use MX how redudancy and session sync will take place ?
> > can you please advise the fesability of the solution.
> > it"s urgent
> > Thanks a lot
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>