[j-nsp] IS-IS not installing route into RIB

[Eduardo Schoedler]

What show route extensive tells you?

--
Eduardo


Em quinta-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2015, Dragan Jovicic <draganj84 at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Hello.
>
> We have two routers in ISP network exporting identical static routes to
> IS-IS; all routers install static route to closest of the two routers.
> Those two routes do not install route received over IS-IS as inactive into
> inet.0 table.
>
> Only when one of the two routers deletes its static route, is route from
> IS-IS installed into IS-IS RIB and in routing table.
>
> Could anyone shed a light on this - is this expected behavior? Shouldn't
> both routers install two routes as inactive into inet.0 table?
>
> Regards
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


-- 
Eduardo Schoedler