[j-nsp] IS-IS not installing route into RIB

[Dragan Jovicic]

Hi,
The route is not in routing table of those two routers.
Every other router installs redistributed route, except those two which are
redistributing the route. Those two only show static/5 route, not ISIS form
other neighbor.

show isis route does not show that prefix is calculated, so it is not in
ISIS RIB hence not in inet.0.

But LSP shows redistributed route. Once one of the hosts removes it's
static route, only then is new ISIS route installed.

I suppose the behavior I expected was to install ISIS route form other
neighbor as well, albeit as inactive.

Regards.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Eduardo Schoedler <listas at esds.com.br>
wrote:

> What show route extensive tells you?
>
> --
> Eduardo
>
>
> Em quinta-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2015, Dragan Jovicic <
> draganj84 at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > We have two routers in ISP network exporting identical static routes to
> > IS-IS; all routers install static route to closest of the two routers.
> > Those two routes do not install route received over IS-IS as inactive
> into
> > inet.0 table.
> >
> > Only when one of the two routers deletes its static route, is route from
> > IS-IS installed into IS-IS RIB and in routing table.
> >
> > Could anyone shed a light on this - is this expected behavior? Shouldn't
> > both routers install two routes as inactive into inet.0 table?
> >
> > Regards
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>
>
> --
> Eduardo Schoedler
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>