[j-nsp] Experience with QFX5100 13.2 & 14.1
darrenoc at outlook.com
Thu Jan 15 06:37:06 EST 2015
Just to add to this. The 48T is not currently seeing a Juniper branded QSFP LR4. The same optic has no issues in the 24Q and 48S.
> From: darrenoc at outlook.com
> To: richih.mailinglist at gmail.com; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:30:30 +0000
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Experience with QFX5100 13.2 & 14.1
> We are currently using QFX5100s for a new deployment.
> VCF, l2, mstp, ospf, bgp, lacp
> There are a number of bugs. Most are getting fixed. I'm currently running the absolute latest version simply to get the fixes I need.
> The biggest issue at the moment is that the QFX boots with all ports UP, even though it can't yet forward packets. This is a big issue where attached servers are dual connected and use link -state to determine which port to send on. This is not a Junos bug, as Junos isn't loaded until much later in the boot sequence. I have been told a boot fix is on it's way before the end of this month.
> > From: richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
> > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:30:54 +0100
> > To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [j-nsp] Experience with QFX5100 13.2 & 14.1
> > Dear all,
> > I was wondering what experience, if any, you have had with QFX5100.
> > Of special interest would be what JunOS version you are running, what
> > features you have enabled, and if you consider them production-ready.
> > This question is open-ended on purpose.
> > Thanks,
> > Richard
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
More information about the juniper-nsp