[j-nsp] MX480 Build
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Wed Jul 22 09:33:43 EDT 2015
On 22/Jul/15 15:24, Colton Conor wrote:
>
>
>
> Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know or
> consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the MX240 is
> too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960.
You take a bigger hit on the MX960 with a fabric failure if all slots
are full.
Because the MX240 and MX480 have fewer slots, your exposure is more
limited in this regard.
But I think with the new SCB-E's, this may no longer be an issue for the
MX960. Been a while since I checked as we are exclusively MX480 for the
time being.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
.
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list