[j-nsp] MX480 Build

[Jerry Jones]

MPX support inline flow on Trio. Not as flexible but possible.

On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com> wrote:

We would be getting redundant (2) RE-2000's with redundant (2) standard
SCB's.

The configuration would be full BGP tables with 4 providers on 10G ports.

The MS-DCP is a requirement for JFLOW on these older cards right? We would
also use the MS-DCP for IPSec tunnels to Cisco ASAs. Any issues with
Juniper MS-DPC talking to Cisco ASA? Might also do some NATting with the
MS-DCP.



On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Will O'Brien - NOAA Affiliate <
will.obrien at noaa.gov> wrote:

> You didn't specify which REs you'd get with it. Make sure you are getting
> a pair. (Even though the 960 uses three SCBs, you can only use two REs in
> that chassis as well.)
> The R blades are pretty solid, but you didn't specify any sort of config
> requirements.
> What will you be using the MSDPC for? (Last I checked redundancy config
> for those was disappointing, but I haven't used one in about a year and a
> half now.
> In the past, mixed mode wasn't recommended, but it doesn't seem to be a
> big deal now. (If you are considering buying MPCs at some point to use with
> the R blades.)
> 
> Will
> 
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 22/Jul/15 15:24, Colton Conor wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know
>> or
>>> consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the
>> MX240 is
>>> too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960.
>> 
>> You take a bigger hit on the MX960 with a fabric failure if all slots
>> are full.
>> 
>> Because the MX240 and MX480 have fewer slots, your exposure is more
>> limited in this regard.
>> 
>> But I think with the new SCB-E's, this may no longer be an issue for the
>> MX960. Been a while since I checked as we are exclusively MX480 for the
>> time being.
>> 
>> Mark.
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> .
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp