[j-nsp] eBGP Failover

[Scott Granados]

I vote for #1 and #3.

Both should give you fast fault detection.


> On Jun 30, 2015, at 4:09 AM, Peter Ehiwe <peterehiwe at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Possible options :
> 1) link bundling technologies   And run single  ebgp session over the
> bundle
> 2) two ebgp sessions with shorter keep Alive
> 3) two ebgp sessions with bfd
> 
> Sent from a mobile .
> 
> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015, Mohammad Khalil <eng.mssk at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all
>> I have a case where my router is connected to the upstream provider via two
>> physical links , we decided to configured eBGP over a loopback interface
>> The issue is that when the remote peer goes down (over which I have learned
>> the loopback from through static routing) , the route will still be
>> installed in my routing table (because from my side it's up) , so I will
>> lose connectivity and my eBGP neighbor will go down
>> So , what is the best redundancy solution I can implement so that I will
>> not lose my peering and switch over to the other static route without
>> disrupting my service?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> BR,
>> Mohammad
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent from Mobile
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp